---- Ready to combat Facebook's censorship? Click here to join the Grassfire Social network now! ----
-By Warner Todd Huston
For 230 some years, the nation’s military has maintained that only men can serve on the front lines in times of war. Now Obama’s Secretary of Defense may soon announce that he will reverse that long standing policy and allow America’s women to join her men in combat.
Reports came today that Leon Panetta will soon remove the long standing ban on women in combat.
Oddly, the new rule seems to be saying that woman can request combat roles. It doesn’t seem as if the change will allow commanders to order individual women into combat.
One wonders how this can be fair? If women can refuse to join the front lines, why are men refused that option?
Dan Foster over at NRO has pinpointed well what must be the next logical step for the Obama administration. If women are to be allowed in combat, why should they be excused wholesale from registering for Selective Service? Shouldn’t Obama reverse that rule, too?
Of course, we’ve already had many women killed in combat and not just in recent actions. But in the past women were killed in battle only by accident, as it were. Women were in support roles, not in combat roles.
Currently, women comprise 14 percent of the 1.4 million active military personnel.
He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com.
Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston and follow him on Twitter, on Google Plus , and Facebook.
Latest posts by Warner Todd Huston (see all)
- Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Group Forced to Admit They Lied About Gun Dealer Claims - January 31, 2015
- VIDEO SATIRE: ‘I Need A Hashtag!’ - January 31, 2015
- European Police Admit That Their Gun Control Laws Aren’t Working - January 31, 2015